Thursday, November 29, 2007

Google Search Appliance 5.0, Enterprise Labs Launched

Google Enterprise launched two things today. First, they put out version 5.0 of the yellow “cheese box” Google Search Appliance. The new version has an enterprise connector framework for connecting to intranet services, platforms, applications, databases and hosted services (like Microsoft Sharepoint and IBM FileNet) as well as enhenaced security.

Also launched, Google Enterprise Labs, where enterprise customers can download new experimental features for the Search Appliances and Google Mini systems. It launches with a search-as-you-type application that can be applied to any text field that queries the Appliance and shows rich preview, complete with thumbnails and category grouping. Also, it has Do-it-Yourself Keymatches, which lets users add smart answers to the top of search results, and Parametric Search, which accesses your metadata to provide seperate sidebar navigation through that data.

Here: A video demonstration of search-as-you-type.


Dell to sell Google appliances

http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2204489/dell-sell-google-appliances

PC maker to offer Google Search Appliance and Google Mini

Clement James, vnunet.com 28 Nov 2007

$30K box for enterprises, $2K for small biz.

User-interface customizable.

Dell has signed a deal with Google allowing the PC maker to sell Google Search Appliance and Google Mini devices direct to corporate customers.

Although the units are actually manufactured by Dell, the firm has not been able to sell them until now.

"Having Google Search Appliance and Google Mini bolsters our enterprise offerings and simplifies the search engine process for our commercial and public customers," said Terry Klein, vice president at Dell's Americas Advanced Solutions Group.

"Google's turnkey search appliances align well with Dell's priority to simplify IT in the data centre."

The Google Search Appliance, with its distinctive yellow chassis, is designed for larger enterprises, while the blue Google Mini is targeted at SMEs.

The appliances deliver relevant search results from information sources within a company's firewall.

Companies can also design their own interface that users will recognise from their familiarity with Google.com, without compromising existing corporate security requirements.

"Expanding our channel presence will help meet the growing demand and interest in Google Enterprise solutions worldwide," said Darci Dutton-Reimund, head of North America channels at Google Enterprise.

"Dell's partnership is critical in helping us deliver the best of Google business innovation to our rapidly growing customer base."

The Google Search Appliance starts at $30,000 and the Google Mini starts at $1,995.

How to Conduct an Audience Survey

January 12, 2005
http://www.techweb.com/mediakit/m2i/jan05.html

You're receiving this newsletter as a member of Marketing2IT from CMP Media's TechWeb Network. For more details, see the bottom of this email. If someone forwarded you this issue and you would like to subscribe, please go to www.Marketing2IT.com.

How to Conduct
an Audience Survey

An Interview with Donna Fabyonic, CMP Research Manager

Welcome to Marketing2IT. This issue focuses on how to conduct an audience survey, with practical tips for getting the best results.

There are many reasons to survey your customers (or prospects, readers, target market, etc.) A typical audience survey will help you gain greater market intelligence including: interest in your product, purchase involvement, job title, professional role, type of business, size of firm, publication readership, trade shows visited, and more.

This data in turn will help you develop the strategy and tactics to achieve your corporate sales, marketing communications and branding objectives. Read on to find out how.

With 10 years of market research expertise, Donna Fabyonic knows what works and what doesn't when it comes to running surveys. We asked Donna to share her tips on conducting successful surveys. Her most recent TechWeb Online Audience Survey got 3,560 responses and covered the entire TechWeb Network.

M2IT: How do you define which audience you want to survey?
Donna Fabyonic: Typically that is dictated by the survey objectives. For our online audience survey it's important to get as broad a selection of the visitors as possible - ensuring we have an accurate representation of the varied visitor 'types' to our sites. From there you can segment the results to narrow it down.

M2IT: What are some of the key ingredients of a successful survey?
DF: First, keeping the survey as brief as possible will help you achieve your response goals. Second would be a topic that spans the interest of several departments at your company (to get as much mileage from the results as possible) as well as the community you are surveying (to get them to want to participate in the survey). Then I would say obtaining as random a sample as possible to ensure the validity of the results.

M2IT: What are some of the best practices for recruiting respondents?
Be upfront with the audience as to survey length, respect visitors' privacy, and offer an incentive that they are going to want to receive. And of course, a key element is a well-written survey invitation. It's also important to attach a cookie to prevent visitors from taking the survey more than once.

M2IT: How many results do you need to be statistically significant?
DF: For any research study you want to try to achieve a minimum of 100 completed surveys. From that you can project out onto a larger universe. For our larger sites we try to get 250 or more to make it that much more significantly stable. At this level, you've got about a 6% margin of error.

M2IT: What role do surveys play in the IT marketing process?
DF: Surveys can help tech marketers hone their messaging. If you know what your market wants to hear, it makes it a lot easier to build effective creative. Or, pre/post campaign surveys can help measure shifts in awareness.

M2IT: Should surveys be multiple choice, yes/no, short answer or a mix?
DF: While simple yes/no questions are useful in any survey, I find them most valuable as a means to send respondents down different paths of questioning. Multiple choice and even rating matrices are my favorite. You can get a lot out of these depending on the question asked (select all that apply, select top 3, top 1, etc). Short answer questions, used in moderation, can be very informative. They allow the respondent to expand beyond a simple single or multi-select question. And depending on the respondent, you can get some great info. But mostly these open-ended questions tend to slow the survey-taking process down and when used too frequently, annoy the survey taker.

M2IT: What are the potential benefits/risks of conducting a survey?
DF: Increased intelligence is the main benefit. One risk is that you don't get the survey results you were looking or hoping for. But that in and of itself tells you something. Another risk is that you don't achieve a projectable sample base. But that is something you can try and manage by monitoring recruiting methodologies.

M2IT: How important is it that the survey be conducted by a third party (i.e.: not affiliated with the company)?
As long as you conduct an honest survey and deal with the results in an honest way, it is not critical to conduct a survey with a third party. If you are looking to get a lot of mileage in the press, want to sell your results, or are doing a large-scale industry-wide type of survey though, a third-party provider will bring credibility and eliminate any perception of bias

M2IT: Can you describe the TechWeb Network reader profile?
DF: Our visitors are technology-savvy professionals heavily involved in purchasing IT products and services for their company or organization. They are responsible for large budgets and rely on technology information web sites to provide them with the tools they need to make smart purchasing decisions.

M2IT: What kind of purchase involvement did you discover in the survey?
Not surprising, most of our audience (72%) is involved in the purchase process for their organization in one way or another with close to half of them (48%) responsible for their entire company or multiple companies within their organization. These technology buyers have influence over substantial annual purchasing budgets. Overall, each is responsible for an average annual budget of $21.8 million on technology-related products/services.

The TechWeb Top 10
Here are the current top 10 terms IT pros are searching for according to the TechWeb Network search logs:

  1. rfid
  2. voip
  3. outsourcing
  4. linux
  5. erp
  6. spyware
  7. intellectual property
  8. it spending
  9. retail
  10. phishing

Top 11 Successful Survey Tips
1. Gather data that's useful for many functional areas within your organization.
2. Select a topic that is interesting to your audience to increase response rates.
3. Create a well-written survey invitation with a short catchy subject line.
4. Be up-front about the number of questions and time to complete the survey.
5. Keep the survey as brief as possible: 10-12 questions maximum.
6. Get a minimum of 100 completed surveys.
7. Obtain as random a sample as possible.
8. Run the survey for a minimum of one week.
9. Offer an incentive that your audience will want to receive.
10. Attach a cookie to prevent any visitor from taking the survey more than once.
11. Respect visitors' privacy.


Tech Marketing WebCast
CMP's How to Market to IT WebCast is available on-demand. Find out more and register at www.Marketing2IT.com.

Global Competitiveness Audit
The CMO Council is conducting a new online survey designed to capture the insights and perceptions of high-tech and telecom executives on the changing structure and nature of competition in their industries. Take the survey.

Featured TechWeb Ad Products
TechWebCasts: Build a qualified list of leads, self-selected and engaged in your technology products. [More...]

Pipelines: Surround an audience that's researching news and information in your choice of topics. [More...]

Cost Per Click: Your links display around the TechWeb Network by topic or by brand. [More...]


New clients in the US should contact...
West Coast
Kathy Kottenbach
Account Manager
kkottenbach@cmp.com

East Coast
Nadine Watson
Account Manager
nwatson@cmp.com

Complete Contact Details

The TechWeb Network
is part of


The Fine Points
1. If you received this email directly from us, you received it because you registered to attend the How to Market to IT TechWebCast or you were a member of the TechWeb's IT Ad Club. (Notes_Placeholder) This email was sent in strict compliance with CMP Media's Privacy Statement.

2. To unsubscribe: If you'd rather not receive further emails from TechWeb's Marketing to IT, just click the "Leave" link below. If you'd rather a human took you off the list, just respond to this email and I will personally remove your name.

Regards,
Michael Grover
Director of Marketing
CMP Media's TechWeb Network
mgrover@cmp.com

Google + SurveyGizmo, Part 2: Integration

http://www.surveygizmo.com/google-surveygizmo-part-2-integration/
November 13th, 2007 by Christian Vanek

Two weeks ago we wrote a post describing how to pass information into SurveyGizmo from Google Adwords. Very nifty! *This week* we are going to pass information from SurveyGizmo into Google Analytics. Even niftier, huh?

Why would we want to do this? Well, Google Analytics is a very powerful (and free) web analytics suite. With it you can track survey conversions, path analysis, sources of surveys traffic and even various versions of your forms and surveys. It’s the best of both worlds.

So let’s get the ball rolling:

Introduction to Google Integration Code

When you create a Google Analytics account you are given code snippets and instructed to place them at the bottom of each page on your website. For use in surveys, you will need to add them to the HTML Template of your Survey’s Theme.

There are two parts of the code you are asked to embed: 1) A javascript library that Google provides and 2) a little snippet of javascript code that actually triggers the analytics record.

The first part looks like this:

You should place this bit of code at the top of your survey’s HTML template (the very top).

The second part looks like:

So, where does this part go? Well, first we are going to modify this bit just a little. Why? Because we want to track individual survey pages, and make them a bit easier to understand in Google Analytics.

So, here is what we are going to do. We are going to pass an argument (a bit of data) to the urchinTracker function that will identify individual pages of the survey. We are also going to create a ‘fake’ folder for our survey. So change this second bit of code to:

You should replace ’surveyname’ for every survey you integrate. Make it distinct and understandable. The merge code [%%:Survey_Page%%] will merge in the current page number. Tip: If you want to get fancier you can merge in the value of a hidden question on the page, or even question data from previous pages this way.

Place this modified code at the very bottom of the HTML Template.

Congratulations. When you launch your survey, it will store the navigation and traffic information to your Google Analytics account!

From here you can treat your “surveys” folder like it was just another part of your website. You can run your favorite reports, build charts graphs, etc. Enjoy!

Next week we will look into test variations of your surveys and landing pages and doing analysis in Google Analytics.

Google + SurveyGizmo, Part 1: Adwords

http://www.surveygizmo.com/online-survey-google-adwords/

November 8th, 2007 by Christian Vanek

In the past two months we have received a huge number of questions concerning Google and SurveyGizmo integration. We’ve gotten so many, in fact, that we decided to write a three-part article that shows everyone how to do just that.

This week: Part 1 - Tracking Keywords and Ad Type from Adwords
Next week: Part 2 - Using the A/B/C Splitter to Test Landing Page Variations
Finally: Part 3 - Hooking Your Survey up with Google Analytics & Conversion Funnels

This week we are going to show you how to link a landing page in SurveyGizmo to a Google Adword’s campaign and how to pass valuable information from Google into SurveyGizmo. The two pieces of information we are going to track are: 1) the keyword that triggered your Ad’s clickthrough and 2) whether your ad was shown on a search results page or on the content network.

Let’s leap right in:

Step 1 - Create your Offer Landing Page

Naturally, before we can go into Adwords and set up our campaign, we need to create a Landing Page for the offer. So, what exactly is a “landing page”?

Definition of a Landing Page

The destination web Page for people responding to an advertisement, designed specifically for that campaign and audience. The key difference between a home page and a landing page is that the former must be all things to all visitors, while the landing page should be narrowly designed to optimize conversion for a specific campaign.

The easiest way to create a landing page in SurveyGizmo is to create a new survey with our landing page template and then add your own text and images. Remember, with SurveyGizmo you can brand your landing page any way you want; our templates are just starting points.

Here are some tips for your landing page:

  • Don’t ask for more information than you need. Each ‘extra’ field you ask for might cost you valuable leads.
  • If you have a complicated qualification process, break it up into a few pages.
  • Remember, you have all of SurveyGizmo’s features at your disposal. You can ask qualification questions or make your landing page interactive with Show/Hide logic!

Step 2 - Linking Google to your Landing Page

After you create your landing page, you need to setup your AdWord’s campaign to link to it. So, from your Adword’s control panel, copy the Survey Link that we provide you and paste it into the Adwords destination URL box.

Now here is the cool trick!

We want to track which keywords are generating conversions. To do that, we tag a little extra line after our survey url, like this:

http://survey.12342-21.sgizmo.com/?keyword={keyword}&from={ifsearch:search}{ifcontent:content}

This works becuase SurveyGizmo will automatically track data sent through the URL!

Now that we have keyword and ad type tied to every response, we can look at conversion as a whole, as in the report below. Just make sure to check off “Include URL Tokens in Summary report” for your report options:

SurveyGizmo Keyword Report

Or, to get a more in-depth look, we can create a report that filters based on keyword and ad type.

If you are a Free user, you’ll have to export your data into Excel to see these keywords, but at the Pro level you get access to filtering so you can create reports right in SurveyGizmo.

That’s it for this week. If you have questions feel free to post them in the comments for this blog post. I’ll answer them as soon as I can.

Next week: We will show you how to perform A/B split tests on your landing page to see which version and offer text work best!

Christian Vanek
Christian is a founding partner of SurveyGizmo and the lead software engineer. He comes from an 11-year consulting background focusing on marketing and content management tools. Christian is based out of Cambridge, MA.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

ITIL? No. MOF, yes.

        
ITIL WORKS, BUT I PREFER THE MICROSOFT OPERATIONS FRAMEWORK
by Niel Nickolaisen

http://searchcio.techtarget.com/magItem/0,291266,sid19_gci1279615,00.html?track=NL-545&ad=613082&asrc=EM_NLN_2580904&uid=6532949

Read More from Niel Nickolaisen 

I don't confess this to too many people, but to really understand this column, you need to know that my undergraduate degree is in physics. This is hard for me to admit because being a physics major with a career in IT makes me some kind of a double nerd.

In my physics curriculum, one of the most difficult classes I had to take was Thermal Physics. The only thing I sort of remember from two semesters of the course is the laws of thermodynamics.

The second law of thermodynamics applies perfectly to human beings. It states that, left to itself, the entropy (or disorder) of an isolated system will increase over time. In other words, unless something acts on it, a system tends toward disorder. The human form of the second law is that, left to ourselves, we humans will complicate everything around us. Why else would we attempt to have our IT systems handle every known exception?

A perfect example of our tendency toward complexity is the most recent version (version 3) of the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL). Consider the glossary of terms in version 3 -- it's 58 pages long, up from 42 pages in version 2. I have no objection to continuous improvement, but I typically look for improvements that streamline and simplify, not expand and complicate.

Don't get me wrong, I am a big fan of ITIL and was an early adopter. I love the concept of how ITIL was created. Rather than an academic exercise (like the Capability Maturity Model, COBIT and ISO), ITIL was created by assembling a group of IT practitioners (people like us) who worked together to define a set of IT best practices. ITIL assembles these best practices around IT processes such as configuration management, incident management and service delivery. In its early form, ITIL was an answer to my prayers, describing what I should be doing to make sure IT was a reliable, credible provider of services and projects. After adopting and using ITIL for six months, we improved system reliability from less than 92% to over 98% (and continuous improvement got us to over 99.5%).

Still, a few years ago I opted out of ITIL use, training and certification when I learned about the Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF). MOF is based on the same principles as ITIL but is on a more edible scale. I like the cost of the MOF documentation (free on the Microsoft Web site). I also like the fact that there is no such thing as MOF certification -- not only because I have never seen much benefit from ITIL certification but also because, too often, we humans try to rationalize complex process by dangling a certification carrot. For example, the MOF configuration and change management documentation is simple and concise (about 26 pages), whereas the associated ITIL documentation fills a book.

Granted, MOF does not handle all of the exceptions, but my passion is to eliminate as many exceptions as possible. I have used the MOF framework to achieve results at least as good as those I achieved with ITIL -- that is, dramatic performance and reliability improvements.

To make sure I do not miss a best practice breakthrough, I still review ITIL when it releases a new version. But so far, MOF seems to more than meet my needs. No exceptions.


Tuesday, November 13, 2007

CRM at center of Customer Data Integration ("Master Data Management")

Customer data basis for CRM, MDM at Schneider
By Barney Beal, News Director
13 Nov 2007 | SearchCRM.com

Summary
CUSTOMER DATA BASIS FOR CRM, MDM AT SCHNEIDER http://go.techtarget.com/r/2572116/6532949
Barney Beal, News Director

Creating master customer data helped Schneider National not only salvage its CRM project but build a foundation for a master data management (MDM) program and other strategic objectives, its director of enterprise architecture told attendees at the Oracle OpenWorld event being held here this week.

Several years ago, as Green Bay, Wis.-based Schneider saw its business expand beyond just trucking and into a broad set of services, the shipping and logistics company found its customer data, and the location of that data, expanding just as rapidly.

We found ourselves looking at many repositories for customer information," Pravin Nair, director of enterprise architecture, said in a session at the conference. "There were 50-plus customer information repositories, and those were just the ones IT maintained. We lost count of how many the business was using on the side in Excel, etc."

Currently, Schneider manages more than 11,000 tractors, 15,500 drivers, 55,000 trailers and 22,300 associates in 28 countries. In 1990, the company was primarily focused on asset-based tracking, the "one-way van," but by 2006 it had expanded into brokerage, bulk and financial services, according to Nair. With it, revenues grew to four or five times what the company brought in 16 years before. Executives learned that the customer experience was suffering.

Full Article
SAN FRANCISCO -- Creating master customer data helped Schneider National not only salvage its CRM project but build a foundation for a master data management (MDM) program and other strategic objectives, its director of enterprise architecture told attendees at the Oracle OpenWorld event being held here this week.

Several years ago, as Green Bay, Wis.-based Schneider saw its business expand beyond just trucking and into a broad set of services, the shipping and logistics company found its customer data, and the location of that data, expanding just as rapidly.
For more on customer data, CDI
Get serious about data quality with our Data Quality Learning Guide

See why a true view of the customer requires data symbiosis


"We found ourselves looking at many repositories for customer information," Pravin Nair, director of enterprise architecture, said in a session at the conference. "There were 50-plus customer information repositories, and those were just the ones IT maintained. We lost count of how many the business was using on the side in Excel, etc."

Currently, Schneider manages more than 11,000 tractors, 15,500 drivers, 55,000 trailers and 22,300 associates in 28 countries. In 1990, the company was primarily focused on asset-based tracking, the "one-way van," but by 2006 it had expanded into brokerage, bulk and financial services, according to Nair. With it, revenues grew to four or five times what the company brought in 16 years before. Executives learned that the customer experience was suffering.

"We rely a lot on some pretty big customers who take advantage of the broad portfolio of services," Nair said. "It was becoming more apparent in terms of the customer experience that who they call and how we interact with them was being hampered by our information problems."

In late 2004, Schneider launched a customer master program and eventually elected to purchase the Universal Customer Master (UCM) from Siebel to get it started. This in itself was a departure for the company, which "has traditionally been a build-it-yourself organization," Nair said. "We like to think there's nothing else out there that can do it and serve our unique needs."

Eventually, however, someone suggested looking to off-the-shelf applications and, partly because it had already purchased Siebel for its CRM application, the company added the UCM as well. Schneider had embarked on the customer master project with the goal of enabling the CRM project but quickly realized that in addition to marketing, customer service and sales, the focus had to be on the customer master if it wanted to back its strategic goals for the next five to 10 years.

"We [learned] a lot … from how we did the customer master using UCM [about] how we want to transform all the data," Nair said. "It was really a launching point to our bigger goal."

In fact, the CRM project was put on hold in August 2005 when it ran into some resource constraints and some difficulties with change management, particularly in the call center, Nair said. Customer service staff struggled with capturing activities, issue resolution and changing processes that were based largely on legacy applications.

"We re-looked at that and said the objectives are still valid, but our growth trajectories could not be accomplished with the systems we had in place," Nair said. "We worked it out to make sure CRM would not be burdensome to the customer service flow."

Now, Schneider has been able to leverage the integration between CRM and the UCM. For example, if a customer service representative is entering a new customer into the CRM system, the system records that process without having to add a separate customer master data maintenance screen.

Schneider also has a data warehouse with Cognos running on the top of it and, in 2006, began piping Siebel analytics into it.

"One of our early forays into common enterprise services was, if you want to get rates, we encapsulate the validation into Trillium and connect that back to the Enterprise Service Bus and connect that to any process that's needed in UCM or CRM," Nair said. "Eventually, when we think about full self-service capabilities, that's something we will enable through Avaya back to Siebel."

Schneider's source data comes from a monolithic mainframe-based system that houses customer information such as billing and customer orders. The UCM also ties into a Lawson ERP system on the back end.

"We had created different stacks of systems for different lines of business, and now we have multiple stacks of capability," Nair said. "With order management or customer management, there's a lot of overlap of functions that need to be maintained. Our strategy going forward is to look at things like customer management and order management."

Key customer master lessons

Schneider learned that in order to ensure the success of its customer master project, it was vital to first identify the factors that were driving it and then design accordingly. The company held a series of information definition projects that identified the core processes and involved the line of business working with IT.

Business was also involved in building data quality into the processes and systems, and the company has a data steward program to keep business vigilant over data quality issues.

The change management issue also became a key learning experience when it delayed the CRM project. Schneider now has a change management center of excellence and methodology that follows the change management aspect of any process.

"Don't skimp on robust conversion testing," Nair also advised. "We did have a robust test environment. We wanted to make sure the impact on downstream legacy operations was minimal."

Finally, when coming up with a business case for the customer master, Schneider determined it didn't need one.

"The customer master product was deemed foundational to all major transformations," Nair said. "It does not have a standalone business case. We quickly came to a consensus and got buy-in from the executive team. Looking at the customer master was foundational to lots of strategic objectives. I think, personally, that was fortunate. If we had gone down the regular path of ensuring the rigor for this particular investment, we probably would have gotten mired down."

Outage

.............................

Not a Slam Dunk, # 31

Things that go wrong with webcasts.

From the Help Page for a leading webcast hosting service:

If you are experiencing problems viewing or listening to an event, please review the following minimum requirements and frequently asked questions.

Minimum Requirements

Hardware and Operating System Configurations

Media Players

Internet Browsers

Internet Connection

Cookies and JavaScript

Java Virtual Machine



Test Your System

Click here to test your system if it meets the minimum requirements



FAQs

The Audience URL in the confirmation email didn't work.

I am prompted to register again even if I already registered for the event

I keep receiving an error message stating that the form is missing information or I am entering an invalid e-mail address when I register.

Can I access the event from a different computer than the one I registered from?

I am asked for a password when I try to view the event

I can't get back to the registration page!

Pressing the "Launch Presentation" button doesn't do anything

I received a message that the event is not currently available.

I receive an "HTTP not found" error message.

The sound works continuously, but the video freezes.

The media player automatically stops or it continually stops and rebuffers

I can't hear anything (or the sound is very faint or choppy)

I can access the event, but I cannot view the slides or the slides are not flipping.

My computer crashes when I try to access the event

I can see the video but I can't hear anything (or the sound is very faint or choppy)

I can't see the test video.

I can see the test video but I can't see the event video.

The video is choppy

I cannot view the Desktop Presentation portion of the Event, and am getting a 'Java Not Found' Error

I cannot hear the audio in a Live Demo Webcast (that includes a Desktop Presentation)


Monday, November 12, 2007

IT Support: Change Management

Iterating on IT Service
http://community.ca.com/blogs/itservice/archive/2007/07/02/winning-the-whack-a-mole-change-game.aspx

Simplify and unify technology, business, and service

Winning the Whack-A-Mole Change Game
In a previous blog entry, “Winning the Whack-A-Mole Support Game,” I compared IT support to a Whack-A-Mole arcade game, with issues popping up like moles from holes, two or more issues popping up for each one solved. I said that ITIL® was the best mallet to use for this game, and discussed Incident and Problem Management. Now, I’d like to continue the analogy with Change Management.

Ask support managers what causes more incidents than anything else and they’ll answer “change.” Ask support technicians what question solves more problems than any other and  they’ll answer “what changed?”

There is a saying among system administrators, “Change is evil.”
It’s surprising, but many support teams dread solutions. Why? Because solutions are implemented with changes and changes cause more incidents. Whack one mole and two others pop up. One uncontrolled and poorly managed change leads to two more and the whacking never ends.

Many organizations begin their ITIL journeys with Incident Management and follow with Problem Management. But when I see sites struggling with an onslaught of incidents and problems brought about by changes, I’m not surprised that they’re jumping to Change Management as their second big ITIL project.

The risks involved in changes to the infrastructure are hard to avoid. IT systems are complex. Tightly-coupled and highly-distributed IT systems are efficient but they can propagate errors unpredictably because changes ripple erratically through the system. No wonder the troops on the IT frontline hate change. They know full well that when you bend an otherwise robust IT system, it may break.

But change in the infrastructure is desirable, if not inevitable.
Problems have to be solved and the system has to grow with new requirements and new technologies. An IT system that cannot evolve as rapidly as the business it serves is a drag on the enterprise.

Change Management has evolved to reduce the risks of change endemic to this complex environment. Change Management forces the examination of each change from many viewpoints to proactively identify risks. Not only does Change Management control what changes, it controls when a change takes place and who is informed of the change. By placing the changes under this 360-degree microscope, the unexpected and undesirable side effects of changes are curtailed.

Change Management is difficult to implement. Incident Management often can be implemented with the current support team learning some new practices, but still relying on the people and problem solving skills they developed before ITIL. But Change Management shakes up the whole IT department. Technicians and managers can be frustrated with new procedures that at first may seem to be extra work without any return. The commitment to Change Management has to be solid. The effort must be championed vigorously on a high level to overcome initial resistance.

Nevertheless, Change Management is mighty attractive as an ITIL practice.
Those organizations that see beyond the difficulties and zero in on the benefits of Change Management are making a decision that shows extraordinary foresight.  For them, the payback is enormous. They are on their way to winning the Whack-A-Mole Change Game.


CMDB

Iterating on IT Service

Simplify and unify technology, business, and service

Why CMDB?
At CA World last month, I participated in a round table with a group of CA partners - including Accenture, BearingPoint, and Cap Gemini-where we discussed significant problems in IT. We talked about how we, as software vendors and service providers, could help meet these problems by improving our products and services.

The discussion was open and ranged widely.
We talked about many technologies, and CMDB was at the forefront of our discussions. Of course, since I am deeply involved in CMDB product development, CMDB is always on my mind. But I still had to ask myself: Why CMDB now?

CMDBs are hot, but they're not new. In fact, we were implementing CMDBs for European ITIL-savvy clients a decade ago. Outside of ITIL, definitive databases of configuration items and their relationships have been in use for a long time. (See Why CMDBf Matters - IT's not a solution in search of a problem," Iterating on IT Service, April 20, 2007.) Visualization, reconciliation, synchronization, dependency discovery, and federation are all features of commercial CMDBs, but a CMDB still requires an IT department that understands and is committed to configuration management.

ITIL and CMDB
A CMDB is the foundation for many ITIL practices, to the point that a CMDB is almost a symbol of ITIL itself. But the popularity of ITIL does not explain the popularity of CMDBs. It merely raises the question: why has ITIL become so important?

There is no simple answer. Compliance is a factor. A decade ago, IT was relatively free of compliance issues, but the list of IT regulations today has become long and continues to grow: SOX, HIPAA, Graham-Leach-Bliley, Basel II and so on. SOX compliance, for example, is not a one-time investment. Controls must be reviewed and revised when the infrastructure changes, increasing costs throughout project lifecycles. Ad hoc processes increase the difficulty and expense.

Consequently, IT departments have been forced to systematize their processes by turning toward practice frameworks like ITIL. CMDBs are one of the components that can improve a wide range of ITIL processes-including change, incident, problem, availability and capacity management.

Risk is a factor.
In addition to regulatory pressures, risk has driven corporate boards and executive management to become more aware of the role of IT in the enterprise. When something like a Blackberry crash disrupts business, non-IT executives begin to think of technology risk assessment and abatement. CIOs and IT managers ask how their practices could minimize consequences. At these times, ITIL practice is seized upon as an antidote to IT risks.

But I suspect that sustained interest in best practices does not come from IT crashes.
ITIL and CMDB help blunt the effects of technology failures, but they are really aimed at the biggest technology failure of all: technology that fails to serve the business that funds it. ITIL will not suddenly align business goals and IT services, nor will an isolated ITIL CMDB implementation reverse decade-long configuration management habits.

Thankfully, IT is becoming more introspective and instead of trying to solve problems with more technology, the goal has become to apply technology more carefully.

Both IT departments and IT professionals are stepping up the maturity ladder. CMDBs have been around for a long time, but real news is that IT has matured to the point that it is ready for them. The buzz around CMDB is a symptom, not a cause, of this professional growth.

Friday, November 9, 2007

Five Tips for Great E-Service in the Financial Services Industry

How to Increase the Responsiveness, Efficiency and Consistency of E-Service

August 2007

http://www.insidecrm.com/whitepaper/pdf/E-Service%20Financial%20Svc.pdf

Table of Contents

· Executive Summary

· Introduction

· A survey of e-service effectiveness in the FSI marketplace

· Five Tips for Successful E-Service

· Tip #1 – Model the issue resolution techniques of your best agents

· Tip #2 –Deliver a seamless escalation experience across all channels

· Tip #3 –“Right channel” your customers

· Tip #4 –Treat e-mail as the mainstream channel it has become and meet customer expectations with fast response

· Tip #5 –Make it easy to keep e-mail interactions private

· Practical Applications and Results

· TD Waterhouse – Intelligence increases agent productivity and customer satisfaction

· Bank Leumi – Unified knowledgebase for agents and customers delivers a higher standard of service at lower cost 8

· Conclusion

Executive Summary

In the financial services industry, e-service is not working when:

􀂃 95% of company websites cannot answer a simple question.

􀂃 67% cannot provide satisfactory answers via e-mail.

􀂃 Only 6% of websites let self-service customers escalate inquiries to e-mail or telephone channels.

􀂃 17% fail to respond to an e-mail inquiry at all.

These were the unfortunate results from a “mystery shopper” survey conducted by KANA and IBM to assess the effectiveness of e-service in more than 70 financial service institutions.

In this paper, we will look at how banks, insurance companies and investment firms can reverse this trend and implement e-service that delivers the level of timely, responsive and consistent service customers demand. Here, you will find five tips that will help your organization rethink its e-service strategy to offer customer-focused, yet highly efficient service that promotes greater customer satisfaction and operational productivity.

Introduction

Financial services institutions (FSIs) have been quick off the mark when it comes to leveraging e-service channels. From ATMs to online banking, FSIs have been ahead of the curve in deploying electronic channels to improve the customer experience. But, like companies in all industries, the quality and efficiency of e-service provided by FSIs have not always lived up to expectations. As the 2007 Global Contact Centre Benchmarking scorecard reports, customer satisfaction has dropped 15% since 2005.1

Jupiter Research believes e-service investments are even driving more costly phone contacts as customers pick up the phone after a bad e-service experience. Jupiter predicts that incremental off-line contacts due to failures in online service will grow annually by 18% through 2010. In 2006, failed e-mail inquiries were predicted to drive 71% of these incremental contacts, while failed self-service inquiries would drive 27%.

A survey of e-service effectiveness in the FSI marketplace

This year, KANA and IBM evaluated the effectiveness of e-service provided by more than 70 major FSIs in a variety of sectors including retail banking, insurance and investment. This “mystery shopper” survey asked a series of questions to measure the usability and response quality of each company’s Web self-service and escalation via

multiple channels.3 Questions were simple and relevant to the type of industry. For example, banks were asked about cancelled check charges and interest rates on checking accounts. Insurers were asked if claims could be made online. Investments firms were asked if they could trade on a foreign stock exchange.

The results indicate FSIs have significant room for improvement when it comes to eservice:

- 95% of websites surveyed could not answer a simple question.

- 67% did not provide satisfactory answers via e-mail.

- Only 6% offered the ability to escalate self-service inquiries to e-mail or telephone channels.

- 17% failed entirely to respond to an e-mail inquiry.

The KANA-IBM study ranked the overall quality of online service offered by each FSI according to

their proficiency scores for a number of contact channels and effectiveness of each channel. Only

4% scored in the top “Multi-channel Leaders” quadrant for having multiple and highly effective

channels available to their customers. 25% landed in the “Best Practice” quadrant for having only a

few channels but using those channels effectively. 15% fell into the “Lip Service” quadrant with

multiple, but ineffective channels. The majority of companies – 58% – fell into the lowest quadrant

for lack of both the necessary online access channels or for having a channel that was ineffective.

Five Tips for Successful E-Service

Obviously, implementing electronic channels is not enough to guarantee great customer service. So how can e-service work better for FSIs and their customers? Based on KANA’s experience with leading financial firms around the world, the following five tips will help you start delivering the level of service convenience and quality your customers and your company demand.

Tip #1 – Model the issue resolution techniques of your best agents

Driving intelligence into the process of answering questions is a key enabler of customer satisfaction and agent efficiency. Start by going beyond standard search techniques to offer guidance that helps agents and self-service customers through the process of finding an appropriate resolution. Provide multiple ways to look for answers

so that users can choose a method that matches their level of skill and mimics a oneon-one interaction with a highly knowledgeable agent. For example, in addition to standard and advanced search capabilities, offer step-by-step scripts and dynamically generated FAQs that help users efficiently express the intent of their questions and pinpoint the most relevant answers.

Don’t stop with the just answer. Increase the value of your service and reap higher retention and life-time value by offering advice along with the solution. When a credit card customer inquires about a car loan, guide the process of finding the most appropriate information about a loan. Then, use knowledge of the customer and products owned to suggest an equity line of credit that provides debt consolidation, a lower rate and tax deductions. This advice-driven response delivers the dual benefit of a better deal for the customer and an effective up-sell for the company. Finally, increase the consistency of answers with a unified solutions knowledgebase that can be shared by agents and customers alike across all channels, including selfservice, e-mail, live chat and phone. Online customers learn to trust the self-service experience when they can be certain that the answer will be the same on your website, from an agent on the phone or a teller at the branch.

Tip #2 –Deliver a seamless escalation experience across all channels

In the eyes of customers, self-service convenience is never a substitute for live interactions. It turns out that “I can talk to a person when I want to” is still the number one factor in creating a positive experience with self-service according to recent research by HarrisInteractive. Customers must always be able to reach you with simple paths to live communication built into your self-service strategy. Provide quick, easy ways for customers to escalate from a self-service session with one-click links to assisted service channels, such as e-mail and live chat. Ensure that no matter which channel the customer chooses for escalation, the experience is smooth and seamless. The key to delivering a seamless experience is to preserve the context of the customer’s self-service inquiry when transferring to an escalation channel. With the self-service session history maintained, agents know what solutions have been tried and rejected so that they do not ask the customer to repeat solutions that have already failed. The session history can be also be used to analyze the context of the incoming escalation to appropriately route the inquiry and automatically supply the agent with recommended solutions.

Tip #3 –“Right channel” your customers

Selectively match channels and service levels to customer profitability. For example, you may want to offer e-mail as the primary escalation channel for lower-value customers and reserve more costly interaction channels, such as live chat, for your long-term or high-value customers.

Take advantage of solutions that let you proactively engage with self-service customers to drive sales and forestall online abandonment. You can use business rules to automate the process of proactively extending chat invitations at particularly opportune moments, such as when a customer browses a high-value page or has spent an unusual amount of time completing an online account application, suggesting help may be needed. Let customers tell you how and when they want to hear from you. Offer them the opportunity to subscribe to proactive notifications about topics of specific interest, such as automatic e-mails or SMS alerts about unusual account activity or completed trades.

These outbound communications convey your company’s understanding and awareness of the customer’s needs, while at the same time presenting a valuable opportunity to deliver relevant cross-sell and up-sell offers within the context of asked for operational messages.

Tip #4 –Treat e-mail as the mainstream channel it has become and meet customer expectations with fast response

As the SSPA points out, in the 1990s, surveys showed customers expected an e-mail response within 24-48 hours. Now, surveys indicate a two-hour response window is best, with younger users growing impatient after the one-hour mark.4 Give your e-mail service as much attention as you do your phone service to ensure fast answers. Use automation to set expectations for response and shorten reply time such as:

· Auto-acknowledgements for immediate feedback that establishes the time frame for response.

· Intelligent queuing, business rules and language detection to route an inquiry to the most qualified agent.

· Message analysis and categorization to analyze the inquiry before it reaches the agent’s desktop and recommend the most appropriate answer.

· Back-end system integration to automatically fetch and insert relevant data, such as account information, into replies.

Tip #5 –Make it easy to keep e-mail interactions private

Satisfy governmental regulations and corporate requirements for protecting the privacy of electronic communications in a way that makes it simple and easy for customers to do business with you. Rather than imposing

Cumbersome encryption/decryption schemes on your customers and agents, ensure privacy through secure, personal Web portals. With this type of implementation, sensitive information is never included in an e-mail. Instead,

customers receive an e-mail reply that contains a link to the appropriate portal site.

Once customers log on, they can read the response securely and reply back as necessary through the portal.

Customers can also initiate secure exchanges through their private portals.

What to Look for in Secure E-mail Solutions

Look for solutions that:

· Do not require customers to install additional software or hardware.

· Automatically enforce corporate communication security policies and maintain corporate security standards.

· Automate the process of determining which e-mails should be treated confidentially using rules to scan incoming messages for sensitive content, such as the alphanumeric pattern of an account number.

· Prohibit e-mail messages from containing sensitive information so that you can continue current best practices for e-mail management, including analyzing content, applying routing rules and sending autoacknowledgments or replies.

· Are fully integrated into the agent desktop so that confidential messages can be created with just one click.

Practical Applications and Results

KANA customers have been applying these tips to their e-service operations for many years. The results speak for themselves: higher customer satisfaction, greater operational efficiency, widespread self-service adoption and increased up-sell/cross-sell rates. Let’s look at how these tips have benefited two FSIs and their customers.

TD Waterhouse – Intelligence increases agent productivity and customer satisfaction

Great Britain’s second largest discount broker, TD Waterhouse UK, regards customer service as the “make or break” factor in customer relations. To improve its service, the company identified the need to develop multi-skilled customer service teams that would effectively support any customer question about its large and growing product portfolio. TD Waterhouse built an intelligent environment for its service staff using KANA’s knowledge management solution, KANA Agent IQ. Agents have access to a variety of information retrieval methodologies and a single, unified solutions knowledgebase containing thousands of solutions. The ability to guide agents through the resolution process has meant that even the most inexperienced staff members can now help customers with complex trading, support and other inquiries.

As a result, TD Waterhouse UK has reduced hold times by more than 23% and escalations to the back office by 16%. The effects of these improvements are reflected in the company’s customer satisfaction rating as well, which has risen 12%. In addition, the company can now rapidly retrain representatives to provide support across multiple

lines of business, resulting in higher productivity, greater levels of cooperation between departments and a more attractive working environment for its customer service teams.

Bank Leumi – Unified knowledgebase for agents and customers delivers a higher standard of service at lower cost

Through its online banking, online trading and direct banking help desks, Israel’s Bank Leumi enjoys a reputation for quality service with service level agreements approaching 100% at its online banking support center. To better manage its growing portfolio of complex products and services and reduce the time needed to train agents, the bank implemented KANA Agent IQ in its call center. With the knowledgebase providing one-stop access to solutions and intelligent guidance to help agents resolve inquiries, Bank Leumi has been able to reduce training costs by 66%.

Bank Leumi has also implemented KANA Customer IQ for customer self-service. The bank regards the ability of the unified knowledgebase to ensure consistent answers across channels as crucial to the success of its banking strategy. The self-service implementation ensures 24x7 service, solving the problem of not being available to

assist customers due to the practice of not working on parts of Fridays and Saturdays.

The self-service implementation has produced real benefits as call deflections have been measured at 17%, and the bank has increased its customer base 15% to 20% without adding agents.

“The system enables us to deliver outstanding service to our Internet-based customers and to set a new standard in customer service via Internet channels.”

Itzhak Malach

Senior VP, Head of Operations

Bank Leumi.

Conclusion

The KANA-IBM mystery shopper survey shows that much work remains to be done

when it comes to delivering e-service successfully. Using the tips we have outlined

here, FSIs can deliver an e-service experience that is always timely, consistent and

customer-focused. As the TD Waterhouse UK and Bank Leumi experiences illustrate,

thoughtfully implemented e-service can lead to significant improvements in customer

satisfaction, while reducing pressure on other service resources to deliver the level of

service customers want.

For More Information

To learn more about how the KANA suite of intelligent multi-channel solutions can help

you create customers for life, call 1-800-737-8738.

About KANA

KANA is a world leader in multi-channel customer service. KANA's integrated solutions allow companies to deliver consistent, managed service across all channels, including email, chat, call centers and Web self-service, so customers have the freedom to choose the service they want, how and when they want it. KANA's clients report doubledigit increases in customer satisfaction, while reducing call volumes by an average of 20%. KANA's award-winning solutions are proven in more than 600 companies worldwide, including approximately half of the world's largest 100 companies. For more information visit www.kana.com.

Copyright 2007 KANA Software, Inc. KANA and the KANA logo are registered trademarks of

KANA. Other company, product and service names may be service marks of their respective

owners. All Rights Reserved.

181 Constitution Drive

Menlo Park, CA 94025

T 650.614.8300

F 650.614.8301

1 2007 Global Contact Centre Benchmarking Report for 400 contact centers in 43 countries.

2 “The State of Customer Service 2006: Trends in Consumers’ Attitudes and Behavior” Jupiter Research

3 KANA-IBM Online Customer Service Study: US Financial Service Sector, 2007

4 “10 Best Practices to Increase ERMS Success” John Ragsdale, SSPA, July, 2007.